E-Mobility – Discriminatory, egocentric and damaging

The West, specially Germany, are obsessed with E-Mobility, whilst there are technologies much better and safer than E-Mobility, the so-called hydro power or water power. This has already been tested and proven to work, even in rockets, beside of cars. The exhaust spits out pure, even drinkable water, and the refill of the gas tanks is fast, just like patrolling a car nowadays. (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_vehicle)

Germany only contributes 2% of the worlds CO2 emission, but cries and pushes as if it were the worse environment polluter ever, whilst the USA and China are leaders in thus that topic.

(Source: https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/each-countrys-share-co2-emissions)

The Green party is the political force pushing for all what we hear on daily news; no more coal, no nuclear, no fossil fuels. Yet more wind energy, E-Mobility and less meat and the highest taxation system, to punish the people.

Germany's Bundesrat has decided to significantly increase the level of carbon dioxide tax in Germany in 2021. The decision means that in a few years, the EU's two strongest economies, hence Germany and France, will have a price on CO2 emissions of 50 EUROS per tonne. The decision applies to the entire economy so it includes heating and transport, so not just to the heavy industry.

Of course, Germany could shut down all its nuclear plants and coal plants, but then the system would collapse. Wind alone will never cover the needs of an industrialized country, unless industry is willingly destroyed; and its ongoing, especially in Germany’s backbone, the car industry. Not to mention, all the trees, that absorb out CO2, changing it to oxygen, being cut down, to produce space for the wind parks. Lets also mention all the birds that have been shredded by the blades of the rotors. France is producing most of its energy through nuclear power, and would happily export their power to Germany, when its on its knees. Electricity in France is cheap and clean, the same it already is in Germany; and even coal plants have huge filter systems, doing the most possible; and Germany is clean, now already.

The problem with E-Cars starts nationally. The range is limited t a maximum of 500 kilometers, and that’s for the most expensive models only; so, let’s give an average of 250 kilometers to be generous. (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car)

Riding down Germany, would mean a least 3-4 stops to fill up the batteries, and each filling would take around an hour, at its least. (Source: https://auto.howstuffworks.com/how-long-does-it-take-to-charge-an-electric-car.htm)

Who can and wants to do that? The second problem is the cycle, the human cycle of the working population. If all working humans will come home during the evening and plug their car, that demands a sudden high need to electricity, that won’t be possible to supply. Not to mention, that the production of batteries produces more CO2 than fossil fueled cars and use metals that are mined, often through child labor, in Africa.

Another issue occurs internationally. Even if Europe is in parts ready for such a technology, too many countries in Asia and the most in Africa would have no chance to follow. Not only don’t they have the powerplants to supply such a need, neither does the average person have he capacity to purchase such a vehicle, not drive it safely of either bumpy or non-existing road systems. Extreme heat or cold, have both proven to destroy, or at least shorten the life spam of a battery.

So all in all, the leftist green politics is nothing more than a guilt free feel policy, being able to be complied with by and through the rich, and a blind making policy that disregards the doable and lets those politicians continue live a lavage life without even following what they shout for. They still drive cars, fly planes and use electricity and heat their homes. As ridiculous their politics, they should start as role model, by using the bike to parliament, travelling by sail boat or donkey, and cut their electricity supply, or at least place a wind mill in their garden, and don’t heat anymore.

We can take it from there

By Thomas Fleckner

The Showdown

Europe is awakening from its fake beauty sleep.

Bundestag (German parliament) President Wolfgang Schäuble has sharply reprimanded the AfD Group and the deputy Thomas Seitz for a minute silence in the case of Susanna. (Susanna was a 14 year old girl who was raped and killed by a Muslim illegal migrant from the middle east. One source: https://voiceofeurope.com/2018/06/iraqi-asylum-seeker-admits-he-murdered-the-14-year-old-german-teen-susanna/) "A single member of parliament may not collect the Bundestag by an arbitrary call for a minute of silence for its purposes," said Schäuble on Thursday in the Bundestag. He urged that democratic rules be observed, and no hatred be encouraged. We ask ourselves what keeping a minute silence for a rape and murder victim has to do with hatred.

Seitz told last Friday in his parliament speaking time, that he had dedicaded to give his speaking time for the killed Susanna. The 14-year-old girl was found dead in Wiesbaden a few days ago. Seitz had been demonstratively silent with reference to Susanna - together with the deputies of his faction, some of which rose from their seats.

Source: https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/deutschland/parteien/id_83934204/wolfang-schaeuble-ruegt-afd-fuer-schweige-aktion-im-fall-susanna.html

Whist this seems to be a winning step for the so called main stream governments again, we can observe European countries standing up to take measures. Austria wants to set an end to the illegal influx, which Hungary has already started longer before. Italy stops illegal migrants from docking their harbor for the first time and after the election of a new right wing government. Source: https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/ausland/krisen/id_83933504/nach-aquarius-abweisung-erneut-sitzen-fluechtlinge-im-mittelmeer-fest.html

Outside Europe, but with huge influence, Trump shakes the G7 summit, by refusing a common communique and the wish to have Russia back, which also Italy supports.

Sources: https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/ausland/eu/id_83928202/bundeskanzler-sebastian-kurz-will-fluechtlingslager-ausserhalb-der-eu-errichten.html

https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/deutschland/parteien/id_83939378/asylstreit-merkel-bleibt-hart-soeder-loest-eklat-aus.html

In Germany, Merkel and the CSU are on confrontation course, with the sister party CSU of Bavaria demanding a national handle to send the refugees away, following the example of Austria or France. In reaction, the Chancellor wants now not only in two weeks, but faster to seek a European agreement. That sounds like a Merkel compromise, not a national agreement, as her time is over. We must note, that this new hardline stance comes from the fact that the AfD party is in the Bundestag and there are elections ahead in Bavaria. Maybe the CSU is finding back to their routes and is no longer willing to bow before Merkel over and over again.

Recent media reports have also pointed to barely manageable disagreements, possibly including personal rollout. For example, the "Welt am Sonntag" reported that Mr. Seehofer (Interior Minister) questioned the CSU's internal future cooperation with Merkel. "I cannot work with the woman anymore," he is claimed to have said twice.

State Secretary Günter Krings of the CDU warned about a break between CDU and CSU in the Bundestag with reference to a similar process more than 40 years ago. That time both parties were in opposition. "A Bundestag in which the CDU is in the government, and the CSU in the opposition, is something nobody likes to seriously imagine," said Krings.

There is a hope that the hopeless EU as it is may still see a chance to fall into a Europe of national states with national souverain status and the defense of its culture, identity and freedom. European projects can still be done, and all European countries will be happy to work together, but without external interference on national level from Brussels. The secular Europe it has fought for over decades may be saved from the influx of the most non-democratic and totalitarian and human rights abusing system through its blind followers.

Meanwhile in The Netherlands, Geert Wilders has got the green light from parliament to organize a "Mohammed cartoon" competition in the name of freedom and expression. The goal is to have as many cartoonists as possible make cartoons about the founder of Islam. We may see angry Muslims threaten the House of Representatives, and possibly set fire to embassies and consulates of the Netherlands in the Middle East. These expected outbursts only come from Islam, showing again how incompatible it is, because Europeans can draw any other religious figure without fearing for their life and health. Europe went already through decades of Christian terror; it doesn’t need another religious dark age again.

By Thomas Fleckner

(Image: t-online.de)

Germany – A hippie state lead by its emotions

No, this is not an i-Arose invention; but in September 2015, the beginning of the present illegal migrant crisis, Professor Anthony Glees a prominent commentator on European affairs, has described Germany as "a hippie state, being led by its emotions." His words, describing Germany's role in the migrant crisis were already then making headlines on websites and in newspapers. Professor Anthony Glees, who is the Director of the Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies at the University of Buckingham, spoke to Newsday.

This expression doesn’t only show the controversy Germany is in, but also the illogical and unnatural combinations and compromises it is executing and calling for. For example, hippies rejected mainstream organized religion in favor of a more personal spiritual experience. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sufism often resonated with hippies, as they were thought to be less rule-bound, and less likely to be associated with existing monotheistic religions. Some hippies embraced neo-paganism, especially Wicca. By the 1960s, western interest in Hindu spirituality and yoga reached its peak.

So Germany wants to prove the world that they can do better and always good after the dark era of the 3^rd Reich. Infiltrated with guilt and riddled with shame, and consciously and unconsciously manipulated to hate the German identity; the seemingly tolerant self-made modeled main stream showcase of a softened center, a left and green and liberal mixture has come to a point of absurdity and artificially existence.

We all reject the dictate of the past, nobody, and that includes the parties as AfD in Germany (Alternative for Germany) and the PVV (Party for Freedom Netherlands) i.e. That is why, and only because of that, the present political executions are creating an irreparable fallen Europe.

The unnatural combinations and compromises are not done within Europe, to strengthen inter-European relations and resolve differences; no, they are done to eliminate Europe in how we know it; a Europe of freedom, humanity and peace. The illegal import of an Islamic culture is not just a threat to democracy, freedom and humanity, but also to peace. We just have to observe the middle east and we receive all answers.

Already in 2006 Professor Anthony Glees wrote an article in the Independent arguing for internment without trial and the overturning of the European Convention on Human Rights. Glees argued that, 'Academics should think the unthinkable,' and 'not be blinkered by political correctness.' He argued that the European Convention on Human Rights had 'gone too far' and was 'deeply flawed'.

In the closing paragraph of the article Glees called for action 'against extremism' and urged Britain's Muslims to leave the country:

Liberal democracy will be easily destroyed if we do not act against extremism. We give our enemies the weapons they need to destroy us. We need to be more mindful that there is a threshold that should not be crossed. Not everything is permissible. Wearing the niqab is saying we don't want to be British. Forty per cent of British Muslims say they want to live under sharia law. That is unacceptable. They should go to a country with sharia law. (Source: Powerbase)

This is yet one of many examples of warnings and statements by highly educated people; and nobody seems to bother.

Europe is following a tactic lead by politicians as Angela Merkel, Mark Rutte, Jean Claude Juncker, etc. The idea is pursuing what they have started, make fake compromises to appease the opposition they just dismiss by calling them “far right” or “political extremists”, racists or Nazis. All logically wrong and irrational; but it sounds good, because nobody wants to be called out “bad” in society, or to be associated with the bad. The newest development is what we can observe in Germany. The government was about to collapse under the pressure of the coalition partner CSU, the Bavarian counterpart of the nation-wide CDU, the party of Angela Merkel. The minister for interior took an AfD stance, by saying that illegal migrants should be rejected entry. Merkel did not want that, so a deep internal fight begun. We must know that the state of Bavaria will have elections soon, and the CSU, always the strongest party there, is weakening, and all because of the AfD party. Bavarians are known to have more national pride and identity.

Rarely have CSU and CDU disputed in the asylum issue, at times, the Union was apparently facing the split. Now Horst Seehofer and Angela Merkel have come to an agreement. According to the Federal Chancellor and Federal Interior Minister, transit centers will in future ensure that no asylum seekers come to Germany who are already registered in another EU country. But is this really a new agreement?

In principle, there are already some sort of transit centers in Germany. Namely at certain airports, such as in Munich. The so-called airport procedure checks asylum seekers who come to Germany from a country classified as safe. This is exactly what is being done at airports already. The airport procedure allows accelerated decisions and rejections. So, nothing new here!

The compromise between the CDU and CSU yet stipulates, that the "transit centers" will only be set up once agreements have been concluded with Austria and Italy. But the new right-wing government in Rome has no interest whatsoever in taking back registered refugees, and their representatives have said that very clearly. So, what happens if there is no agreement, ergo no "transit centers" can be built? Anyone asking these questions in the government hears nothing but eloquent excuses.

There is no plan B. Not even the concrete idea of ​​finding a solution on the model of the Turkey deal (which swap one refugee for the other and additionally transfer a lot of money). There is only hope that everything will go well somehow (The typical Merkel strategy to sit and sit and wait and wait, until things resolve by itself or are no longer questioned). The huge relief that this daydream that the last moment federal government has been saved from the falling apart, is just temporal, as there is opposition; real opposition, hence the AfD. In a movie that would be a nice punch line. In the government of the most powerful country in Europe it is an indictment; a shame.

Ten thousands of people have died in the sees on their way to Europe; and why? Because the EU and its illusional leaders are supporting the illegal migration, the human traffickers and the flooding of European countries.

Europe’s open border policy was created for the people and the trade of all its belonging nations, not for externals. We all know that immigration is necessary, but in a matter that serves the continent and develops it. The mass immigration of mostly uneducated, even illiterate and cultural so much different people is of no help, but a burden for the people, the social welfare system and the tax payers. Whilst highly educated people from Asia, who don’t want to overturn the system, are over and over applying for legal migration, economic migrants, criminals and Islamic people come in without hindrance.

Angela Merkel is power hungry, as much as the EU body of Brussels is. They don’t care about identity, patriotism or western values; but they have not yet succeeded. Countries as Hungary, Italy and Austria show us that there is a possibility for U-Turn.

 By Thomas Fleckner

Germany's failure; again

Antisemitism is a crime in Germany, ad of course it is, due to the dark history of Germany. And now, due to the open border policy, another illegal act implemented by the present government, Germany is importing antisemitism with open arms. It doesn’t require a PhD to know, that the enemy of Islam is Jewism.

Roughly two weeks ago, Berlin was faced with an incident that overshadowed the news.

In the district of “Prenzlauer Berg” in Berlin, two young men were attacked due to being Jew. This is what happened:

“Two Kippa-wearing men have been verbally abused and attacked in Berlin by three unknown persons. As the police confirmed, the 21-year-old Israeli and his 24-year-old German companion were on the way on Tuesday evening in the district of Prenzlauer Berg, as three perpetrators initially insulted the two men.

One of the group then struck with a belt onto the 21-year-olds. His companions yet are said to have prevented him on further attacks, according to police.

The 21-year-old Israeli filmed the attack. A video spread on the internet shows a young man slamming a belt and calling "Jahudi" (Arabic for Jew). The attacker says, "I'm filming you." As a result, the companion of the attacker pushes him away. In the background, a woman calls, "I call the police." Then the attacker shouts: "Jew or non-Jew, you have to deal with it." What happened before is not visible in the recording.

On Israeli television, the young man later said that he and his companion had previously "walked on the street in the normal way - we have not talked to anyone". Then three men suddenly started to abuse him. When his friend told them to stop, "they got angry, one of them ran to me".”            

(Source: https://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitgeschehen/2018-04/judenfeindlichkeit-berlin-uebergiff-kippa-maenner)

Shortly after the attack, the Central Council of Jews advises against wearing the Kippa, a little cap that is worn by Jews, therefor identifying them as such. Failure to oppose open anti-Semitism will ultimately endanger our democracy, "said the President of the Central Council of Jews. And right he is, as let’s think of another scenario. What if suddenly Christians are attacked when identified as such through wearing a cross on the chain, or Atheists or Agnostics, when wearing a t-shirt showing a quote of Christopher Hitchens or Carl Sagan? For sure there would be an up-rise of outrage from the Christian community and government; but for the Atheists or Agnostics, I would not dare to make a prognosis regarding the reaction from government. But nevertheless, both Christians and Non-believers are also the enemy of Islam.

Coming back to the call for not wearing the Kippa. This is a big shame for Germany; and it seems that the call for not wearing a burka or a niqab is dealt with more fearful and unwillingly, than removing the Kippa from someone’s head, a symbol that is neither sexistic, oppressive nor disguising hence masking.

Die Welt, a German newspaper wrote the following:

“The Jewish Community in Berlin has called for a solidarity campaign with the Jews in the city on Wednesday. The motto "Berlin wears Kippa”; as many people as possible should set a sign against anti-Semitism.

The police have recorded an increase in anti-Semitic attacks for years, having had 288 cases in 2017. The Research and Information Center for Anti-Semitism Berlin (RIAS) has calculated even higher figures for 2017. It recorded 947 cases, including some that are not criminally relevant.”    

(Source:   https://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitgeschehen/2018-04/zentralrat-der-juden-josef-schuster-kippa-tragen-grossstaedte-warnung)

On the 27^th of April, another incredible case popped up.  Allegedly, the ex-leader of the BAMF has accepted bribes in Bremen. Asylum applications were wrongly granted asylum. This should have created significant security risks. 

The affair of suspected wrong decisions in positive asylum decisions of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) in Bremen draws more circles. According to "Spiegel" information, the suspended ex-leader should have foregone a security-relevant document check in one case. A co-accused interpreter is said to have received 500 euros from refugees. The prosecutor Bremen did not want to comment on both. There are many speculations, but only at the end of the investigation could be clarified, said a spokesman for the authority.

It is shocking how the Leftist bypass German laws and help illegal migrants to infiltrate the system. This not only hurts Germany as a country, but also shows how uncontrolled and wrong immigration works in Germany. Germany needs 35000 nurses and care takers, which people from Asia for example could do perfectly. Those migrants have no interest in destroying the system or creating parallel societies or no-go zones. They integrate well, learn the language fast and are of great help for society. Not that Islamic migrants stand out for mainly not being integrated, as their religion dictates their god Allah as highest authority and not German law, but due to its sexist and segregated policy, wouldn’t even allow women to be nurses or care takers touching men.

What adds worse on all the latter mentioned, as that now the AfD (Alternative for Germany) is blamed for what has happened. A recent statement rings alarm bells:

“From the point of view of the designated anti-Semitism commissioner of the Federal Government, Felix Klein, the AfD has contributed to the fact that anti-Semitism is more noticeable in Germany today. Klein said, "Anti-Semitism has become more blatant." This probably has something to do with the fact that the political climate has become rougher overall.”

(Source: https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/deutschland/innenpolitik/id_83685256/-dazu-beigetragen-antisemitismus-beauftragter-klein-kritisiert-afd.html)

This is an interesting and shocking statement which needs to be corrected. First of all, “anti-Semitism is more noticeable in Germany today”; that is true, but not the fault of the AfD. The AfD is just rightly pointing the cases out, cases the present and former government has just swept under the table. Silence is not solving problems! Further, Markel’s open-door policy has invited more and more anti-Semitic people into the country, resulting in an increase of attacks on Jews. So, who’s fault is it?

By Thomas Fleckner